On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Lewis Perin wrote:

> Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs / dmu.ac.uk> writes:
> 
> > Emacs to use Ruby instead of (e)lisp?  I'm thinking of:
> > you'd get more readable code [...]
> 
> Not, I suspect, if the Ruby code were the output of a machine
> translation.

I meant for the code that the user of Emacs adds, to tune it.
Sorry, that was not clearly worded.
> 
> /Lew
> -- 

	Hugh