On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:59:01AM +0900, ahoward wrote:
> how many of you are actually using the CGI tag methods?  i currently am using
> Amrita for all of my html generation and thus do not need my cgi objects to be
> dynamically extended with 'html3' or 'html4tr', etc.  also, as someone pointed
> out a week ago on this list it is this (the dynamic extension) part of CGI.new
> which is exceedingly slow.  is there any reason then why we should not be able
> to :
> 
>   cgi = CGI.new(nil)

For me, under 1.6.8, that works just fine. What result do you get?

Regards,

Brian.