Hi, 

I'm sorry for delayed reply. 

In message "[ruby-talk:00660] Re: Your wish is fulfilled (erhm, almost ;-)"
    on 99/08/13, Clemens Hintze <c.hintze / gmx.net> writes:

>Perhaps I can allow to give a block to the section command, so it could
>be used both, as I like and as you like it?

I want to thank you for accepting block. 

>But please tell me then, what the semantik is? What happens with the
>internal counters after reaching the end of the block? 

I mean semantics for the level of nest in this case. But I did not 
think deeply on end of block action... Well, I'd like to think it 
again after use for some time. 

>I don't think it makes sense to have a summary after every `end'.

You are right. 

>BTW: Is there any format recommendation for rd-docs? What sections
>should contained? What info? What cames first, what last, ... etc. pp.?

No details are decided. And some disscussion started in Japanese
mailing list. I'll try to ask them to move a place for discussion if
you want.

-- gotoken