il Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:02:48 +0900, matz / ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro
Matsumoto) ha scritto::

>Hi,
>
>In message "Re: Objectify the mersenne twister in 1.8?"
>    on 03/02/25, gabriele renzi <surrender_it / rc1.vip.lng.yahoo.com> writes:
>
>|It would even be cool to have a choice, cause (I seem to remeber)
>|that MT is not a *secure* algorithm.
>
>I didn't know MT is insecure.  Do you have any reference?
>
>							matz.


http://www.math.keio.ac.jp/~matumoto/emt.html
says:

Caution: MT is for MonteCarlo, and is NOT SECURE for CRYPTOGRAPHY as
it is.

That was the reason I wrote secure *this way* ..
Well, I could have explained myself better, sorry :-/