MikkelFJ [mailto:mikkelfj-anti-spam / bigfoot.com] wrote:

> This was orignally a follow up to my question about YAML 
> documentation, but grew into a separate topic.
> 
> This is not an announcement, but I think it's about time to 
> get some feedback on the design. It's hardly specific to 
> Ruby, but I guess it would work well in a Ruby context.

Just a quick note: STEP might not be a good name for it, as there is
already a documentation standard called STEP:
http://www.crosswire.org/bsisg/. It might not matter, but I thought I'd
mention it.


Nathaniel

<:((><
+ - -
| RoleModel Software, Inc.
| EQUIP VI