On Monday, February 17, 2003, 12:18:37 AM, ts wrote:

d>> Which, in turn, makes me reluctantly think that it would be better to
d>> have local be the default, and some way to explicitly import variables
d>> from outside the block into the block.  I think the impact on the
d>> overall look of Ruby would be enormously less.

>  Well, you want "export" rather than "import", no ?


Sounds good to me, just as it did when it was first suggested!

Gavin