Mauricio Fern?ndez <batsman.geo / yahoo.com> wrote:

> This is mathematically sound, but in which context would you use it?

Hi batsman,

I don't know.  I think it is the right way to say the upper bound of a
range when the end points are floats.  Is the current concensus to support
a range of floats or are we going to drop range of floats altogether in a
future version or Ruby (and retain only range of integers, and chars,
possibly)?

Regards,

Bill