<nathaniel / NOSPAMtalbott.ws> writes:

> Or #assert_eqq? While a bit bizarre, that does have the advantage of
> being short, distinguishable and memorable.

Yes, maybe there is no good English word for "the === operator" so
inventing one is reasonable.


"Pit Capitain" <pit / capitain.de> writes:

> Someone suggested "assert_case_of" and "assert_not_case_of" recently
> in this thread.
>
> I like it:
>
>   assert_case_of( String, "hi" )

These works less well for Regexp.  E.g. this is true:

    assert_case_of(/x/, "fooxfoo")

Maybe borrow from Ruby's own use of === in "when" statements:

    assert_when(/x/, "fooxfoo")
    assert_when(String, "bar")
    assert_not_when(Array, "bar")


-- 
matt