We don't want to confuse it with #end, #last, and #max (though I think these
are already deceptive and confusing).  Suggestions:

- Range#last_in_range
- Range#last_inside
- Range#last_from_each
- Range#max_in_range
- Range#max_inside
- Range#biggest_in_range
.
.
.

Just some thoughts.  I was trying to convey that this is *inside* the range,
and not an endpoint *outside* the range.  Anything else would be confusing,
I think.

Chris


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Hahn" <rhahn / tenletters.com>


I suggest Range#endpoint.

-rh


On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Range#length?"
>     on 03/02/12, "Chris Pine" <nemo / hellotree.com> writes:
>
> |Well, it's a shame that something wasn't put in to refer to the last
> actual
> |element in the range.  That's actually all I want.  As I said, #end,
> #last,
> |and #max all return `99' for both 3..99 and 3...99.
> |
> |Oh, well.  Nothing a good ``last - (exclude_end? ? 1 : 0)'' can't
> handle.
>
> Do you think of a good name for it?  I'm glad to add a method if
> you have a good name.
>
> matz.
>
>
---
Robert Hahn,
Senior Web Developer,
Quarry Integrated Communications