It occurs to me that you might to support unordered tests by providing a
"random" test sequence method.

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:56:02AM +0900, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
> I hate the fact that test ordering is ever important. I hope that people
> only ever use different test orderings in order to identify test
> interdependency as a step to removing it. But I recognize that there are
> various reasons (a few of them even pragmatic ;-) that will cause
> ordering to matter for some tests.

>...snip

-- 
Alan Chen
Digikata Computing
http://digikata.com