Hi,

In message "Re: Hash#+ ?"
    on 03/01/23, Tom Sawyer <transami / transami.net> writes:

|On Wednesday 22 January 2003 06:52 pm, dblack / candle.superlink.net wrote:
|>   No information lost by String#+ or Array#+, but Hash#update may lose
|>   the value.  That's why I rejected the name "+".  It is possible to
|>   provide the non destructive "update" under different name.  Good
|>   name?
|
|David, what value can be lost? i don't understand.

What if two hashes have same keys with different values?

							matz.