I do like emacs (xemacs) and I'm sure it can do everything I would ever 
want from an editor........... If only I understood how to tell it to.

xemacs is definatly an iceburg for me and I'm not even confident with 
the bit of it above the water..

Glenn

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
> In <rv4kf-4dc.ln1 / burp.earthlink.net>, on 01/17/2003
>    at 02:04 AM, tuxfordNOSPAM / NORETURNearthlink.net (Mike Tuxford)
> said:
> 
> 
>>.... and besides, let's get back to editor wars where we all agree
>>that emacs is superior and fits everyone's
>>needs and styles.
> 
> 
> What you mean we? I want XEDIT with a slight admixture of ISPF.
>