Hal E. Fulton (hal9000 / hypermetrics.com) wrote:

> Most people I talk to seem to think Qt is the best overall.
> But if you care about compatibility with Windows -- it's
> not free on MS platforms.

I did install Fox on my Linux box without any problem, but still Qt has 
advantage because of Unicode support (there is also Designer tool).

I heard that Unicode is also planned for Fox, but don't know about any date.

However, Ruby/Qt community does not look very active.

My $0.02.

Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
Gour
gour / mail.inet.hr
Registered Linux User #278493