Hi,

> From: "Bil Kleb" <W.L.Kleb / larc.nasa.gov>
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:56 PM

> > [..] I'm not sure that's a practice that ought to be supported. As an XP'er,
> > I'd say, "YAGNI!" and delete the TestCase as soon as it's empty, knowing
> > that it's cinchy to add back  [..]
>  >
> > [..] I'd like to hear some more on this first (if there are any other opinions).
> 
> I like the failure when you have an empty TestCase for the XP YAGNI reason
> you stated above.

+1 to failure, to keep health of test.
Empty testcase is exactly a bug of the testcase.

Regards,
// NaHi