Hi,

It's very exciting to see that the Ruby community is quite active. Thanks 
for the help. BTW, is there a KB style archive of previous discussion so 
that we can search for help before asking here?

Thanks!
Shannon


>From: "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair / soyabean.com.au>
>Reply-To: ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org
>To: ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
>Subject: Re: set operation
>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:59:03 +0900
>
>From: <nobu.nokada / softhome.net>
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > At Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:18:15 +0900,
> > Tim Bates wrote:
> > > > if ([string] & array_of_strings).length!=0 then....
> > >
> > > I don't know what 'in' is used for, but another way to do this might 
>be
> > > if [array_of_strings].index(myString) then...
> >
> > Or:
> >
> >   array_of_strings.include?(myString)
> >
>
>I've often thought that Array#=== should do the same thing as 
>Array#include?
>It seems wasted to be the same as ==.
>
>Maybe it's just me.
>
>Gavin


_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail