----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dblack / candle.superlink.net>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby idom needed


> Hi --
> 
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Jim Freeze wrote:
> 
> > On Monday, 25 November 2002 at 11:23:52 +0900, Michael Campbell wrote:
> > > Well said; I found this to be the best balanced between rubyish and
> > > still readable.
> >
> > Hmmm...rubyish... that's awful close to rubish. :)
> 
> I still intend some day to write a Ruby shell called "rubysh"
> (pronounced "rubbish" :-)

Hmm, sounds like a codefest idea... :)

I've given a *little* thought to a shell 
like that. What would it look like in 
practice, though?

Hal