On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 07:28:44AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Making Instace Variables Private/Local"
>     on 02/11/08, Mauricio FernŠŌdez <batsman.geo / yahoo.com> writes:
> 
> |Were Ruby to be invented again, would you do it?
> 
> Class local only?  No, I don't think so.

This answer surprises me quite a lot, for the only tangible reason I can
think of is the speed issue. I really felt it was The Right Thing.

But if it's a matter of 'style', I'll just take it as it is, as I have
already stated I will trust you :-)

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

"You, sir, are nothing but a pathetically lame salesdroid!
I fart in your general direction!"
	-- Randseed on #Linux