At 11:51 PM +0900 10/30/02, Austin Ziegler wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
>  > If them naming scheme is reversed,
>>
>>  NQXML::XML::Parser
>>  REXML::XML::Parser
>>  LibXML::XML::Parser
>>
>>>  include XML::Parser::REXML as XML::Parser
>>
>>  This becomes
>>
>>  include REXML
>
>You're right, but that reintroduces the normal namespace problem.
>I'd still like to alias namespaces, although I'm not sure that it
>would really work all that well (because of the way that namespaces
>are actually modules).

But this is a name-space problem which could be solved by how the
modules are sorted & listed, in the "table of contents".

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad / gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad / freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih / rpi.edu