On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:25:35 +0900, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Austin Ziegler wrote:
>> In this case? None of them, IMO. They would become, under Simon's
>> scheme (and I mostly of agree with it), XML::Parser::REXML,
>> XML::Parser::NQXML, XML::Parser::libxml. What I'd like to see to
> If them naming scheme is reversed,
> 
> NQXML::XML::Parser
> REXML::XML::Parser
> LibXML::XML::Parser
> 
>> include XML::Parser::REXML as XML::Parser
> 
> This becomes
> 
> include REXML

You're right, but that reintroduces the normal namespace problem.
I'd still like to alias namespaces, although I'm not sure that it
would really work all that well (because of the way that namespaces
are actually modules).

-austin
-- Austin Ziegler, austin / halostatue.ca on 2002.10.30 at 09.46.37