From: "Nikodemus Siivola" <tsiivola / cc.hut.fi>


> 
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Austin Ziegler wrote:
> 
> > > Which one gets the name XML::Parser?
> 
> None of them, until (if ever) one of them becomes the canonical one,
> included in the standard library.
> 
>   -- Nikodemus


I second the idea that none be named that, and that they are all named

   XML::Parser::REXML
   XML::Parser::NQXML
   ...

And then just create your own shortcuts:

   require "xml/parser/rexml"

   Parser = XML::Parser::REXML

It doesn't get any more Ruby-ish that that.

Gavin