On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Austin Ziegler wrote:

> In this case? None of them, IMO. They would become, under Simon's
> scheme (and I mostly of agree with it), XML::Parser::REXML,
> XML::Parser::NQXML, XML::Parser::libxml. What I'd like to see to

If them naming scheme is reversed,

  NQXML::XML::Parser
  REXML::XML::Parser
  LibXML::XML::Parser

>     include XML::Parser::REXML as XML::Parser

This becomes

 include REXML

Just a thought,

  -- Nikodemus