" JamesBritt" <james / jamesbritt.com> writes:
> That's what popped into my mind, too.  A definitive name is great if
> there is but one definitive module.

But as I mentioned, if there's a definitive name, you have to think
more carefully about why you're writing a different module, and your
name should reflect what's distinctive about it. Consider
HTML::Parser, HTML::TokeParser and HTML::TreeBuilder. You can easily tell
that they're all HTML parsing libraries but they have distinctive styles.

-- 
The Blit is a nice terminal, but it runs emacs.