Hi,

In message "Re: RAA.succ?"
    on 02/10/23, Phil Tomson <ptkwt / shell1.aracnet.com> writes:

|Those are all great changes, but it still doesn't address the fact that 
|the RAA is just a list of links to potentially non-existent locations.  
|Key packages could be lost after their creators loose interest.
|The RAA needs a change in structure not just a change of interface.

OK, OK.  Let me clarify.

We really need a new RAA with better interface.  This is what Nahi and
others are working on.

We also need something like CPAN for Ruby, aka RAA.succ.  But it
requres much work and time.  So we go step by step.

							matz.