Oops, indeed! :-o (But I'm a lucky guy, after all...)

So even that __ was something C++ did not *give* but
tried to *take away*... ;-)

Sab


> Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:29:06 +0900, Szabolcs Szasz <sz / szasz.hu> pisze:
> 
> > For one, I did routinely mark my C++ private variables
> > as __something, *exactly* to make them look ugly enough 
> > so I won't touch them, ever, only from similarly ugly member 
> > functions, also marked with underscores, like __func().
> 
> This is illegal: all identifiers containing double underscore are
> reserved for a C++ implementation.
> 
> -- 
>   __("<      Marcin Kowalczyk
>   \__/     qrczak / knm.org.pl
>    ^^    http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/