On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, William Djaja Tjokroaminata wrote:

> such a thing is impossible, and that we just let C be C and Ruby be
> Ruby.  But I guess we don't know until we try, right? :)   (Hey, where are

This is definitely so: let ruby be ruby, and C be C. There is no need to
improve either. Instead there might be uses for a yet another language...
;)

  -- Nikodemus