Hello Nikodemus,

Friday, September 27, 2002, 12:51:01 PM, you wrote:


NS> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:

>> of course. so we give anyone choice - write efficiently compiled or
>> easily extensible dynamic code. it is right thing (IMHO)

NS> What I'd *love* would be to keep ruby dynamic as it is, and have a
NS> statically typed language, call it R, with a ruby-like syntax for extension
NS> writing:  the two should be easily interoperable and have equivalent
NS> builtin classes.

my idea is opposite - ruby code with some hints can be effectively
compiled. so there is only one laguage

-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:bulatz / integ.ru