Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:5115] Re: Crazy idea? infix method calls"
    on 00/09/26, hal9000 / hypermetrics.com <hal9000 / hypermetrics.com> writes:

|Certainly let's discuss it then... ;)
<snip>
|Does anyone but me like this proposal at all?

I don't know.  I personally don't feel it's required.  But I can find
the room for the syntax (maybe; I should try first).  If *many*
requested this enhancement, we can add it to the language after
deciding 1) operator priority 2) the name of the internal method.

In [ruby-talk:5125], matju proposed candidate for both.

							matz.