< :the previous in number  ^ :the list in numerical order  > :the next in number  P :the previous (in thread)  N :the next (in thread) |<:the top of this thread >|:the next thread  ^ :the parent (reply-to) _:the child (an article replying to this) >:the elder article having the same parent <:the youger article having the same parent ---:split window and show thread lists  | :split window (vertically) and show thread lists  ~ :close the thread frame .:the index ..:the index of indices

Subject: Re: Matz, if you're reading, please scan this email
From: ts <decoux@ u n n . >
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:58:12 +0900
References: 50525 51226
In-reply-to: 51226

>>>>> "S" == Sean Chittenden <sean / chittenden.org> writes:

S> In the unit tests for libxml, I think I've pushed things to SEGV land
S> with the do_hash() macro during cleanup when it can't determine the
S> classname of an object.  Does this seem plausible? 

 Can you send me, in private email, the tests which crash ruby ?

 I've ruby-libxml-20020919


Guy Decoux