In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209140640310.2346-100000 / candle.superlink.net>,
 <dblack / candle.superlink.net> wrote:
>Hi --
>
>On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Phil Tomson wrote:
>
>> Oh, I definately understand what you're saying and under a different set
>> of constraints I would do just that (refactor).  It's just that the goal
>> here is to basically make Ruby look like another programming language
>> (technically an HDL [Hardware Description Language]).
>
>Will this supersede the other Ruby? :-)
>

The Ruby we all know and love or the other Ruby from the late '80s early 
'90s that just happened to be an HDL?

No, RHDL couldn't supercede the Ruby we all know and love since it's built 
on it ;-)

Phil