On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:32:17PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:33:11 +0900,
> Alan Chen wrote:
> > To answer my own question, exerb aliases the kernel require to do an
> > internal search. However, from my initial code review, extensions that
> > use rb_require end up calling rb_f_require which is just a direct
> > access of the C function. Exerb builds it's own version of ruby to
> > include in the exe anyway, so it could be patched to go to the exerb
> > require code. But should the patch be applied to ruby itself?
> 
> The latest CVS exerb patches extension libraries import symbol
> table and replaces 'rb_require' with 'rbxrequire'.
> 
> -- 
> Nobu Nakada

Thanks, I'll try the CVS version.

-- 
Alan Chen
Digikata LLC
http://digikata.com