Hi,

At Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:22:00 +0900,
Dan Debertin wrote:
> > 'next' just exits the innermost enclosing loop. 
> 
> Er, sorry; I'm really not this stupid. I am, of course, referring to
> the 'break' statement, not 'next'. Sorry for the extra mailbox noise.

  list.each { |entry|
    next if catch(:next1) {
      list2.each { |entry2|
        throw :next1, true if true
      }
      false
    }
  }

I feel such magic number is painful, and a new syntax or
something else may be disirable.

-- 
Nobu Nakada