Hi,

At Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:33:11 +0900,
Alan Chen wrote:
> To answer my own question, exerb aliases the kernel require to do an
> internal search. However, from my initial code review, extensions that
> use rb_require end up calling rb_f_require which is just a direct
> access of the C function. Exerb builds it's own version of ruby to
> include in the exe anyway, so it could be patched to go to the exerb
> require code. But should the patch be applied to ruby itself?

The latest CVS exerb patches extension libraries import symbol
table and replaces 'rb_require' with 'rbxrequire'.

-- 
Nobu Nakada