----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Tomson" <ptkwt / shell1.aracnet.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: embed or swig?


> First take a look at Swig at: http://www.swig.org
> 
> Now to explain a bit more what we're doing:

[snip]

"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice.

Very, very interesting. My to-do list keeps growing.
I'd love to learn SWIG now.

> ....That's the 10000 foot view of what we're doing anyway.  I'm thinking 
> that I need to write an article about this methodology (actually there 
> could be two articles - using Swig and Ruby for C++ unit testing, using 
> Ruby to tie together C++ objects (gotta think of a better title for that 
> one))

Please do write these!

Even if a mag doesn't publish them, you can always put 
them on the web.

I'd vote for the latter (more general) subject first, then
the test-related one.

Thanks, Phil.

Hal