On Friday 02 August 2002 08:14 am, Berger, Daniel wrote: > Now I'm wondering if there's a good way to dynamically compute a > buffer size for such an operation with each 'grab', rather than a > fixed buffer size. Is that a dumb idea? Am I getting into the > "premature optimization" stage? file.stat.blksize will return the block size of the underlying file; multiples of this would probably be most efficient. -- Ned Konz http://bike-nomad.com GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE