> > 2. I like the idea of named method parameters (ala Smalltalk,
> Objective-C).
> > There was a discussion elsewhere showing something similar using
> hash
> > tables.  With a bit of syntactic sugar...   :var => 10 could be 
> var: 10
> 
> I always liked that idea, and was never too sure why it never got
> discussed further.


Would this be a required feature, or optional?   Would I be REQUIRED
to name all parameters?  That would break, well, all existing code,
I'd think.


=====
--
Use your computer to help find a cure for cancer: http://members.ud.com/projects/cancer/

Yahoo IM: michael_s_campbell

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com