Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green / FreeBSD.org> writes:

> That's what I expected Process.wait to do :(  That's how Bourne/Korn
> shells do it.  Perhaps then there should just be a Process.waitall;
> this is an important primitive.

I guess tht the idea was you can always implement 'waitall' in terms
of 'wait', but not the other way around.

However, I agree it might be a useful feature to have lying around, if 
not in Ruby itself, then at least in a library.


Dave