This is ignorant and not helpful. There are many legacy applications out
there on older tech. Upgrading costs money and time, and that escalates
rapidly depending on the size of the app.

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Hassan Schroeder <
hassan.schroeder / gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:49 AM, leam hall <leamhall / gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> What reason is there not to upgrade?
>
> > My tool is for non-programmers. They will
> > generally have neither the time nor inclination to use a tool that
> requires
> > them to maintain a separate Ruby version.
>
> But they'll be happy with an unmaintained, potentially insecure Ruby
> driving this tool? Well OK then :-)
>
> Good luck with that.
> --
> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder / gmail.com
> http://about.me/hassanschroeder
> twitter: @hassan
> Consulting Availability : Silicon Valley or remote
>