how about $stddebug?


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Andrew Vit <andrew / avit.ca> wrote:

> Sounds like a useful gem.
>
>
> On 14-08-29, 6:55, Wayne Conrad wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, there is already a "q" gem.  For now, I'm using the name
>> "print_debug."  It's not a great name.  It just stinks less than the
>> other names I've come up with.
>>
>
> How about "cute_print": synonymous with "pretty", and sounds like "q".
>
> Andrew Vit
>