Or Rubyists are unable to understand the frustration that a language
barrier has created on an important module? And thus resort to labeling it
as a racists rant with remarks about leaving the community instead of
attempting to understand the issue at hand which is that Felipe cannot get
a straightforward response about why his proposed changes were rejected?




On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain / segment7.net> wrote:

> On 2 May 2014, at 13:22, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras / gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > If you must have a maintainer that makes decisions unilaterally,
> > shouldn't it be a sensible person able to communicate properly? This
> > is something Tadayoshi Funaba is not. Apparently he cannot even speak
> > English, so what is he doing maintaining a module of such an important
> > project as Ruby?
> >
> > I believe this explains a lot about why Ruby has such a problem
> > gaining and maintaining popularity. Even though the language is
> > extremely awesome, the implementation cannot advance as it should,
> > heavily in part due to this Japanese culture.
>
> Rubyists are open and welcoming people able to navigate cultural issues
> without resorting to racist rants.
>
> I think you should find a different language.
>
>


-- 
Incoherently,
Ricky Ng