Hi,

Basic aim of mruby is similar to Lua.  The biggest differences are:

* some prefer Ruby to Lua
* mruby comes with standard compiled libraries written in Ruby
* mruby has API that does not need to tweek VM stack directly
* Lua is smaller, and LuaJIT is faster

							matz.


In message "Re: mruby vs. lua"
    on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:50:36 +0100, Marc Heiler <lists / ruby-forum.com> writes:

|Hi,
|
|How will mruby compare to lua?
|
|I could use mruby similar to lua, is that one of the main ideas behind
|mruby?
|
|And I assume that folks who know C will significantly profit from mruby
|more so than "normal" ruby users who know only ruby?
|
|-- 
|Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.