I feel strongly that 'configuration' is a terrible name for a gem.
Even were it available, it shouldn't be used.

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby / zenspider.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2014, at 16:33, Marc Heiler <lists / ruby-forum.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Whoever is the first to upload a gem gets to keep this name, even if
> > inactive.
> >
> > Is there a way to register a gem with the same name, but as secondary
> > gem name?
> >
> > Take the gem called "configuration".
> >
> > I have a project myself that is called configuration.
>
> Generic names are generic. You got beat to the punch by 6 years. Rename your dependency.
>
> You can prefix it with "mh-" or your github username for clarification.