On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Ruby Student <ruby.student / gmail.com> wrote=
:

> Sirbu,
>
> You are taking things too personally. But if you really read and think
> very careful about the answer provided by Robert Klemme, you'll find the
> reasons why there is no way to answer you question in a way that would ma=
ke
> sense.
>  <https://plus.google.com/u/2/105762305556753404219?prsrc=3D4>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:50 PM, S=EErbu Nicolae-Cezar <
> sirbunicolaecezar / gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Hassan Schroeder <
>> hassan.schroeder / gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, S=EErbu Nicolae-Cezar
>>> <sirbunicolaecezar / gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > You guys managed to take the fun out of Ruby.
>>>
>>> Nah, I just checked the Fun Reservoir and it's fully topped off.
>>>
>>> Please proceed with your Monday.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder / gmail.com
>>> http://about.me/hassanschroeder
>>> twitter: @hassan
>>>
>>
>> You clearly don't C# Hassan.
>>
>> Please proceed with your life.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruby Student
>

Oh please you, shut up, your words doesn't mean anything after you kid
around. I agree with the fact that the question wasn't that precise, but i
got my answer, so case closed.

Best regards
Cezar