But NOO, let's make fun of the newbies. Thanks all for your constructive
attitude. You guys managed to take the fun out of Ruby.

Thanks


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:10 PM, S=EErbu Nicolae-Cezar <
sirbunicolaecezar / gmail.com> wrote:

> Despite the fact that everything is an object in Ruby, despite the fact
> that Ruby has more than IF, ELSE, WHILE syntax such as UNLESS, despite th=
e
> fact that you have a very minimal programming language, i think an useful
> answer was something like: "you can implement a singleton much easier"..
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Robert Klemmu e <
> shortcutter / googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:20 PM, S=EErbu Nicolae-Cezar
>> <sirbunicolaecezar / gmail.com> wrote:
>> > So basically nothing.
>>
>> We do not know you. We do especially not know your "vision of Ruby".
>> How should we know what will completely change it? How should we know
>> what kind of replies you are expecting? With such an open question
>> it's basically impossible to come up with meaningful replies.
>>
>> Usually it's best to post more specific questions to get useful
>> replies - just because we're not psychic and cannot read other
>> people's minds. You could start by laying out what your idea of Ruby
>> is - and what you see critical if at all.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> robert
>>
>>
>> --
>> remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
>> http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
>>
>
>