Subject: Re: Byte Arrays in Ruby
	Date: mar 31 dic 13 06:04:05 +0100

Quoting Carlo E. Prelz (fluido / fluido.as):

> Maybe there is something that helps in that direction, but from what I
> know, since in Ruby everything is an object, even if you were to limit
> the disk occupation of the actual variable to one byte, it would then
> need all the management infrastructure that each other object
> requires. Thus, I think you would not save so much. 

Oops. I had not noticed that you'd like to use those data as
booleans.  In Ruby, booleans are already quite optimized memory-wise. 

The saving is even less in this case.

Carlo

-- 
  *         Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte,
* K * Carlo E. Prelz - fluido / fluido.as             che bisogno ci sarebbe
  *               di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu)