On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:00:24AM -0500, Tamara Temple wrote:
> 
> On Aug 9, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Chad Perrin <code / apotheon.net> wrote:
> > *: Yes, I'm aware that JavaScript is not always malicious, but it often
> > is
> 
> I do not think that word means what you think it means.

Okay . . .

"Yes, I'm aware that JavaScript is not always written with malicious
intent, but it often is"

Is that better?  Were you objecting to the anthropomorphism of
describing source code as "malicious"?  What exactly is the reason for
your condescension in this case?  Please elaborate.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]