Kent Dahl wrote:
> Han Holl wrote:
> 
>>Question remains: what is Test, and how do I know what names to avoid ?
>>I assume this was introduced _after_ the construction of
>>atest_aspectr.rb (29 Jan).
> 
> 
> Isn't Test the toplevel module of testunit?
> 
> <SNIP> from="testcase.rb">
> module Test
>         module Unit
> </SNIP>
> 
Ah, I see. The test for aspectr was probably written for one of the 
earlier unit test
programs, and now testunit is _almost_ compatible, except that you 
shouldn't call a test class Test.

Thanks for the reply,

Han Holl