Hi,

In message "Re: Metaclasses..."
    on 02/05/18, Dennis Newbold <dennisn / pe.net> writes:

|> In the current implementation, yes.  They need not to exist in the
|> other implementaions.
|
|Whoa! Now, I'm confused.  What's this "other" implementation you are
|talking about.

Don't confuse.  I didn't say "They don't exist in the other
implementations".  I said "They need not to exist in the other
implementaions (if any)".

And we have JRuby the other implementation in Java anyway.  I think it
also has "meta-objects" though.

							matz.