On Fri, 17 May 2002, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> 
> In the current implementation, yes.  They need not to exist in the
> other implementaions.
>
Whoa! Now, I'm confused.  What's this "other" implementation you are
talking about.  I thought there was only one implementation of Ruby.
Now, it seems like there are two?  If so, why, and in what significant
ways do they differ?  Thanks.

Dennis
 
> 							matz.
>