< :the previous in number
^ :the list in numerical order
> :the next in number
P :the previous artilce (have the same parent)
N :the next (in thread)
|<:the top of this thread
>|:the next thread
^ :the parent (reply-to)
_:the child (an article replying to this)
>:the elder article having the same parent
<:the youger article having the same parent
---:split window and show thread lists
| :split window (vertically) and show thread lists
~ :close the thread frame
.:the index
..:the index of indices
"Dossy" <dossy / panoptic.com> wrote in message
news:20020512040028.GC25936 / panoptic.com...
> Software engineering is not an art, it is a science.
This isn't a statement of belief, it's an objective claim. If valid, it
is true independent of the perceptions or conceptions of any individual
human(s). Assuming this is correct, and I haven't misunderstood, please
supply the objective justification for the correctness of your claim.
[I don't expect this will be possible. ;-) When I see *certainty*
expressed, in almost any context, I hear alarm bells ringing....]
I think you have written down your own opinion, but mistakenly expressed
it as fact. Am I right? ;-)
--
Steve Merrick
"Who cares, wins"