Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Charles Hixson
> <charleshixsn / earthlink.net>  wrote:
>> I must admit that Ruby's fake parallelism bothers
>> me, but I don't like the way Java handles unicode, so JRuby is out.  (I
>> prefer utf8 or 32bit unicode.  Utf8, because that's what the files are, and
>> it takes less space in RAM.  32bit unicode because it's easy to handle.
>> 16bit unicode seems to blend the worse characteristics of both.)
> JRuby handles unicode (and other encodings) the same way MRI does. We
> do not use Java Strings.
>
> - Charlie
>
>
Thank you.  I misunderstood.